Tuesday, 29 January 2008

Puppet workshop by Liebe Wetzel from Lunatique Fantasique


A wad of newsprint, a sweatshirt, a creature made from PVC pipe tubes.... Performance alchemist Liebe Wetzel and her ensemble release the sweet, sad, naive, and lustful beings inside"ordinary"objects. In the absence of language, her puppets speak universal truths.

Liebe Wetzel, Artistic Director, is the artist formerly known as Too Too Tomato, and has performed in a variety of incarnations including puppeteer, performance artist, mime, stilt walker, and clown at a staggering number of fairs, festivals, and theaters throughout the West Coast. She is a graduate of the Dell Arte School of Physical Theatre, and has trained with Keith Johnstone at the Loose Moose Theatre in Canada. She holds a BA in Biology and Biochemistry from Rice University. In 1999 Wetzel debuted her now award-winning style of ordinary object puppetry with a collection of vignettes for adults, Naked Foam and Objects in Predicaments, written and performed by Wetzel with the assistance of director Jeff Raz on comediturgy and the helping hands of a small ensemble of manipulators.

Since 2000, Wetzel and Lunatique Fantastique created and performed in several acclaimed productions, including"Reframing the Hourglass," "Snake in the Basement: The Prosecution of Rev. Bill Pruitt,""The Wrapping Paper Caper,"a holiday-themed show for children and adults,"Brace Yourself!,"and"My Dinner With Lunatique Fantastique."Her innovative work has won many awards including the S.F. Bay Guardian Goldie Award for best new theater talent, as well as Best of Fringe and Top Box Office Hit in the 2001 S.F. Fringe Festival and 2004 S. F. Fringe Festival. The Company performed for the San Francisco Opera in 2005 in Pique Dame. The company toured the U.K. with 3 different shows to rave reviews. She has taught her unique puppetry style to teens in a residency program at Zeum, at The Clown Conservatory, and to teen acting students at Cal Shakes' summer program. In addition, she has taught devising theatre using object puppetry at Sonoma State University.

The year 13 students worked with Liebe on techniques about object theatre and practically worked on ideas for using puppetry in their production of Pillow man that they will perform in May.

Monday, 21 January 2008


Defying society in order to pursue her heart, Desdemona marries Othello, a Moorish General, and follows him to Cyprus where he must repel the threat of Turkish invasion. Iago, a junior officer tormented by his lack of promotion, sets out to destroy their love and manipulate Othello to serve his own ends.

Monday, 14 January 2008

Unit 6 Macbeth production with Patrick Stewart






Patrick Stewart interview
From Shakespeare to sci-fi and back again: Patrick Stewart on Macbeth, resurrecting his love affair with the London stage and Trekkies in the audience...


"They arrive here and Jean-Luc Picard isn't anywhere around. Instead there's something else going on..."

Patrick Stewart is backstage at the Gielgud Theatre, musing on his sci-fi tag and the regular presence of Trekkies in the audience whenever he takes to the boards.

"We're making audiences for Shakespeare here in the West End..."
Patrick Stewart reacts to Trekkies in the audience"I meet these people afterwards, I get letters from them and see them at the stage door," he says, his mellifluous voice becoming more animated.

"And they say, 'I've never seen Shakespeare before, I didn't think I'd understand it, but it was wonderful and I can't wait to come back'.

"You know," he booms, "We're making audiences for Shakespeare here in the West End."

The 67-year-old actor has good reason to feel excited and a little pleased.

Before his Hollywood sojourn in Star Trek: The Next Generation and its big-screen spin-offs, he was the first actor to speak a line on the Barbican stage in the title role of Henry IV.

"ruling by fear"
That was back in 1981. Now he's resurrecting his love affair with the London stage and collaborating on a regular basis with the RSC, tackling Antony and Cleopatra, The Tempest, and now, a pulse-quickening modern dress version of Macbeth.


Stewart's Macbeth is in modern dress
Rupert Goold's production, first seen at the Chichester Festival Theatre, is playing to a packed house in Shaftesbury Avenue, Stewart tells BBC London, shaking that famously hairless head of his.

"It's set in the cold war, somewhere in eastern Europe during the late Forties and early Fifties, and it came out of references in the text to having spies in people's houses, torturing people and ruling by fear."

Shakespeare's familiar tragedy has, in effect, been given a Soviet-style makeover, complete with military uniforms and footage of massed troops marching on what resembles Red Square.


Stewart and co-star Kate Fleetwood
Still, there are some things that don't change. Superstition has it you're not allowed to refer to the play by name within the theatre, lest bad luck bedevil the production.

Could the curse of the Scottish Play have struck already, at this early point in the Gielgud run?

"I had a bath delivered to my home and I'd waited five months for it, and it arrived damaged. I'm blaming the play for it!", roars Stewart in delight.

"What are we to do? We live and breathe it every day, so we're keeping our fingers crossed. Whatever happens can't be any worse than my damaged bath."

Charles Spencer reviews Patrick Stewart in Macbeth at the Minerva Theatre

Rupert Goold is a young, talented director in a hurry to make his name. Patrick Stewart is a great classical actor redeeming time lost in the profitable tosh of Star Trek and the X-Men movies. Together, they form one of the most thrilling double-acts in British theatre.


Hushed intensity and thrilling clarity: Patrick Stewart is superb as Macbeth

Those who saw it are unlikely to forget Goold's inventive staging of The Tempest for the RSC, set on a frozen island in the Arctic, with Stewart as a commanding Prospero who learns just how hard forgiveness is.

Now actor and director are reunited at Chichester in an even more sensational Macbeth that creates such a powerful atmosphere of evil that it raised the hairs on the back of my neck.

The show can stand comparison with Trevor Nunn's legendary staging with Ian McKellen and Judi Dench 30 years ago, a classic, freshly imagined Macbeth that will linger in the memory of all who see it.

The action is set in a bleak subterranean kitchen, complete with fridge, sink, chopping blocks, ovens, a crackling television and a service lift with great crashing metal doors. In the early battle scenes, the place is serving as a field hospital, at which the attentive nurses are suddenly revealed to be the terrifying weird sisters.

Later it is the kitchen of the Macbeths' castle, where feasts are both prepared and consumed. But we know its true location. This is a kitchen in hell.

Though notionally still set in Scotland, the production is inspired by Stalin and the Great Terror. Banquo is killed by lethal injection in a crowded jolting train carriage (evoked with characteristic panache in Goold's staging).

Grainy black-and-white film footage shows columns of tanks and goose-stepping soldiers. A patriotic anthem is sung in Russian before the feast, the decent Ross is tortured by secret policemen. This is the world that inspired Orwell's 1984 and which remains nightmarishly persistent today.

The production is full of sudden illuminations and jolting surprises. The banquet at which Banquo appears as a ghost is staged twice, once through Macbeth's eyes, so we actually see the blood-gouted horror, once through that of the other guests, so Macbeth seems to be screaming at thin air.

The terror of the murder of Macduff's family is conjured merely by the ominous sound of a thug unpeeling gaffer tape. And in the sleepwalking scene, the kitchen tap suddenly runs with blood, even as Lady Macbeth tries to clean her hands with bleach.

The performances are superb. Stewart delivers the great soliloquies with hushed intensity and thrilling clarity, taking us right inside the mind of a man who understands the importance of virtue and morality, but is nevertheless seduced by the terrible lure of power.

We also watch him discovering that further killing is the only way to quieten his conscience, until he is left only with the bitter, exhausted nihilism of the great last act.

The shifting balance of power between Macbeth and his wife is thrillingly caught, too. In the early scenes, it is Kate Fleetwood's sexy, scarily strong-willed Lady Macbeth who is in command, with Stewart seeming weak in comparison.

But he grows in deadly strength even as her mind begins to crack, and by the end there is a desert of emptiness between them.

Among the supporting cast Michael Feast's Macduff is unforgettably moving, the long silence with which he greets the news of the death of his family almost unbearable in its tension, while Scott Handy even manages to make the usually deeply tedious Malcolm interesting.

Two days on, this production still haunts my memory like a vivid nightmare that taints the waking day.
Rupert Goold’s production of "Macbeth" opens with the Bloody Sergeant on a hospital trolley, burbling his news and expiring while receiving a transfusion from nurses who turn out to be witches. Later, these hatchet-faced women become the Macbeths’ hatchet-holding skivvies, then waitresses at the Macbeths’ feast. Meanwhile, the dour, brick-lined ER department becomes a kitchen (with Lady Macbeth in an apron), a torture-chamber (with Ross as victim), and a morgue (with body-bags containing the witches’ apparitions). You can’t accuse Goold of lacking imaginative boldness.

But questions must be asked of a revival that won uniform raves at Chichester during my summer break. Isn’t it desperately busy and sometimes distractingly fussy? It amazes me that Patrick Stewart and Kate Fleetwood give such fine performances when (for instance) one is required to uncork and pour wine for his guests during a major soliloquy and the other to dive and quake beneath a trolley just after Duncan’s murder.

It’s all gloriously inventive. Expect unsettling figures, including the blood-boltered Banquo, to emerge from the sinister industrial lift at the back. Expect a diabolic porter to welcome the entire Macduff family. Expect Macbeth’s feast to be seen twice, once through his eyes, one through his guests’.

It’s also all very political. There are Soviet-like uniforms and film of Soviet-style parades. Soviet agents topically poison Banquo on a train. Stewart even transmutes into a boorish, sadistically joking Stalin at that twice-staged feast. One weary thane has his fag snatched from his mouth and dismembered over his head. And poor obsequious Ross suffers some homophobic humiliation.

Ah yes, Ross. Here, he doesn’t just bustle about aiding the narrative, as Shakespeare wanted. As played by Tim Treloar, he’s an owlish nerd who sobs as he’s violently interrogated by a lord whose lines are actually friendly, then caught by Macbeth and his fellow assassins at Schloss Macduff. How he survives to join Malcolm in England is hard to understand, but Goold’s production is more notable for fitful brilliance than for consistency of approach or fidelity to the text’s demands.

Yet maybe we should blame Shakespeare, not Goold, if we can’t fully understand why Fleetwood, at first as splendidly fearsome a Lady Macbeth as I’ve seen, ends up washing her hands with bleach beneath a tap spouting blood. The hints of vulnerability in between can’t explain so huge a transition. As for Stewart, his key line is surely “to know my deed t’were best not know myself”.

Accordingly, we see this hesitant, stealthily ambitious man forced to become someone or something he can’t recognise as himself. It’s a remarkable performance: sucessively wry, watchful, grieving, angry, astonished, agonised, dangerous, exhausted, bitter, nihilistic. But the suggestion that he’s another Stalin is another example of over-clever direction. Stewart is a lot more interesting than that.

Year 13 Rehearsal schedule for Pillowman, unit 5

Happy new year 13!

Here is a guide to rehearsing your unit 5 play:

Rehearsal schedule for “Pillow Man”

Week one 14-18th Jan 2008-
Edit play to 20 minutes and cast play
Homework character biogs
Find extra rehearsal time

Week two21st- -25th January 2008

Opening scene Tuesday

Character work on Wednesday 1 and 2
Units and objectives for homework

Week 3 28th-1st Feb 2008

Tuesday puppet workshop
Wednesday puppet workshop all day!
Sharing at 4pm to friends.
Discuss what will use in play from this work.

Week 4 4th feb-8th Feb

(Reminder year 13 structured records due date 4th February!!!!!!!)

Work on scenes and blocking scenes
Production meeting for all technical aspects.

Week 5: 11th February-15th

All scenes should be loosely blocked by end of this week.

Half term.

Week 6: 25th feb -29th

Production meeting re all aspects of production

Work on difficult scenes
Prepare set/costumes/lighting/sound

Week 7: 3rd March-7th

Run through of play

Notes and start on detailed work on text.

Week 8 :10th March-14th

Run through of play
And work on technical aspects

Week 9: 17th-20th March

Run through of play
And work on technical aspects

Easter week end

Week 10: 25th March-28th

Lines should be learnt by now

Finalise all aspects of technical work

Run throughs

Week 11: 31st- 3rd April

Detail rehearsals for Easter at students houses
And see run throughs and notes ready to advise for holiday work.

Easter Hols

Week 12: 22nd April-25th April

Dress rehearsals/techs

WEEK END REHEARSAL: 26th April 10am -4pm all must attend.

Week 13:

28th April: Dress rehearsal
29th April: open dress rehearsal
30th April: Performance
1st May: EXAM PERF.


This is a rough guide only but gives some good deadlines to hit.

Wednesday, 5 December 2007

Thandie Newton Master class 4th Dec 2007



Thandie Newton gave a practical workshop on acting for film to A level media and Drama students and some performing arts students from the London Metropolitan University.

She passionately told students to have self belief as a means to succeed in the film industry. She then taught techniques on how to work to camera and finally answered questions about her career. The students were very excited to work with Thandie so closely. This is the beginning of our master class season which will continue until March. Other celebrities to be confirmed. Watch this space!

Friday, 30 November 2007

Review of Women of Troy at the National( Year 13 Theatre visit)


Graham Norton interviewed Zandra Rhodes (right) on one of his many television shows and asked her something along the lines of: “When you’re getting dressed in the morning, is there no point at which you think ‘Right, I’ve put enough things on now. I’ll stop’?”

For some reason, Katie Mitchell’s production of Euripides’ Women of Troy at the National Theatre put Andrew in mind of this question.

Phil had bottled out of this one. Literally: he was downing bottles in a Soho brasserie. So Andrew took along his Zurich pal Anders to see what Katie did to Euripides.

80 minutes later they were out of the National Theatre and off to a party where everyone wanted to know what they thought of the show.

“Interesting,” was Anders’ considered verdict. Andrew didn’t know what to say. “Yes, interesting,” he echoed lamely.

And really, it would have been quite a failure had it not been “interesting” - packed into just 80 minutes were a marvellous explosion, full frontal nudity, pyromania, Burt Bacharach, ballroom dancing, elevators, water, breaking glass, a bucket of water over the head, women scaling ladders in evening dresses and high heels and a dead baby. The dead baby - to be fair - was probably Euripides’ idea.

Katie Mitchell likes to assault the senses and keep one awake (a wise directorial objective when Andrew is in the house) but doesn’t she like to lay it on thick? In theory, this is right up the Whingers’ alley; there is no such thing as OTT in their dictionary. But even so… This production makes the recent fiery production of Euripedes’ The Bacchae look like a rehearsed reading in a church hall. It smacked at times of desperation. Desperately Seeking To Be Interesting featuring the music of Burt Bacharach and Hal David (”Close To You”. Honestly.)

Anyway, the Women of Troy are imprisoned in a port-side warehouse (with more doors than a French farce) waiting to hear what individual fates will be meted out to them by their conquerors.

Performance-wise it’s a bit of a mixed bag. We did enjoy Anastasia Hille as Andromache. She seems to have done a an awful lot of work with Katie in the past (The Jewish Wife at the Young Vic Theatre, Waves at the National Theatre, A Dream Play at the National Theatre, Forty Winks at the Royal Court Theatre, Ashes to Ashes at the Royal Court and Lincoln, The Oresteia at the National Theatre, The Maids at the Young Vic and Uncle Vanya at the Young Vic).

Kate DuchĂȘne in the central role of Hecuba just about manages to keep it together but Sinead Matthews as Cassandra was an absolute disaster; we couldn’t hear a word she said. No, that’s unkind. We couldn’t hear three out of every five words she said.

But then it’s not always easy to come across when you have to do all the work upstage because the entire downstage area is cluttered up with a barrier of tables.

From Row E of the stalls (yes, for once Andrew had splashed out for armrests) the end of the play mostly consisted of watching Row D alternately trying to peer over and then under the table tops to see what Hecuba’s last actions might be. A worthless exercise as it turned out.

There were some really excellent ideas: the Women of Troy were having a party when they were invaded so Katie has put them all in evening dresses clutching their purses which really does get across the idea of “a life interrupted”. Quite whether the (admittedly technically good) quickstepping (sometimes in slow motion) adds anything to that is a moot point. Even if it was to one of the greatest quickstep records ever (”Sing, Sing”).

The only thing missing from the mix is video, which Katie seems to have gotten over for the moment, but where will she go next? What new assaults can she possibly work into her shows? The West End Whingers will not be surprised if audiences at her next show get handed a “Scratch and Sniff” card as they enter the auditorium.

Footnotes

For an insight into a week in the life of Katie Mitchell, see Katie Mitchell’s week.
It was a typically fraught visit to the National. Andrew tried to buy a programme from a kiosk on the way in to the auditorium. “I’m just cashing up, sir” said the woman at the desk but sold him one anyway. The next two people to attempt to purchase a programme from her were met with the same ritual. Why does she say that if she’s going to sell you one anyway? Just to communicate the personal inconvenience? Why doesn’t she cash up after the show begins and then she might find the whole process much less stressful.

Women of Troy: Dominic Cavendish talks to the creative team
Is there any other play in world drama in which the horror of war is more starkly and piteously depicted than it is in Women of Troy? DOMINIC CAVENDISH asks the questions...

Euripides’ tragedy presents its audience with a vision of total devastation. Troy has fallen to the Greeks, bringing to a blood-drenched close the 10-year conflict that began with Paris’ abduction of Helen, the wife of Agamemnon’s brother Menelaus. The consequences for the losers are dire. With their men-folk slain, those women who have survived face the prospect of being distributed as spoils. As a race, their future – embodied by Hector’s four-month-old son, Astyanax – is blotted out; the baby is taken from his mother Andromache and dashed to pieces. Before our eyes, a civilisation is wiped off the map: when the last ships depart with their slave cargo on board, Troy’s remnants are razed to the ground.

‘Soon no-one will remember this city, Everything is dying, even the name; There is no place on earth called Troy.’

As Katie Mitchell, directing the National’s new production of the play, explains: Euripides wasn’t drawing solely on the mythologised past in this account of systematic annihilation. He was writing in the wake of the Greeks’ ruthless subjugation of the island of Melos for its refusal to side with Athens against Sparta during the Peloponnesian War.

‘The play was triggered by his sense of moral outrage at what troops from his country had done to another country. I think Euripides was very angry and close to despair at the military situation he was living through.’ This revival, using a judiciously pruned version by Don Taylor, will see the Trojan women occupying an imaginary theatrical terrain that draws, as she explains, on four eras: ‘We’re drawing from the pot of the Bronze age, from Homer’s time, Euripides’ time and our time. This is a world in which the women can wear the latest ball-gowns and yet believe in several gods.’ In its modern aspect, it will be more explicitly up-to-the-minute than Mitchell’s widely lauded National productions of The Oresteia (2000) and Iphigenia at Aulis (2004). ‘You will see people wearing the clothes that will be worn at Christmas parties this season,’ she says. ‘You’ll be looking at a warehouse that could have been built in the last two decades, a functioning industrial port.’ And that’s because, as she argues, there’s nothing safely out of reach about what Euripides describes. ‘World events lead me to the Greeks,‘ she says. ‘When we did The Oresteia, the war in Yugoslavia was just coming to an end and I wanted to find a piece that would have a conversation with that conflict. When I did Iphigenia, the involvement in the Middle East was just beginning and now we’re involved yet again in the Middle East. The Greek plays seem to provide some of the best material to confront the bigger events in the world we’re living in.’

This is not going to be an evening for the faint- hearted. ‘It’s hard to make and hard to watch. You will watch what happened to people who are, in newspaper-speak, ‘collateral damage.’ But, contrary to how it might appear at first glance, the play isn’t simply an open invitation to bear witness to unbearable suffering. ‘When you first read it, it seems to be all about the grief of the Trojan women,’ Mitchell says. Actually, it’s about their conflict with the Greek men who have to oversee their transportation. The men in our production are more like civil servants and diplomats. They’re trying to negotiate so that both achieve some sense of what they want. The women want to know where they’re going. The men want to get them there with the least disturbance as possible, so that
they in turn can get back to their homes in Greece.’

It‘s a wonderfully subtle story. At some moments, the Greek soldiers show immense decency and at others lack entirely. Some moments the Trojans are careful and respectful and at other points they lose it. The question we‘re asking here is: how do people on the ground, in modern-day warfare, deal with the prisoners they’ve taken?’ When two cultures collide and the victor stares straight in the face of the vanquished
what happens?

THE MITCHELL METHOD
During her career, KATIE MITCHELL has acquired a formidable reputation for being at once provocatively fresh in her approach and hugely rigorous in her method. Here she explains how she prepares before the rehearsal period:
First I do a series of analytical tasks on the material to check I understand every inch of it before I consider any interpretation. I take all the component elements apart and study them incredibly carefully and make sure my connection to the material is not biasing me in a certain direction. I do as much research as possible – you have to know why it was written, how it was initially performed, the historical context. Then I make decisions about how to communicate the play. I cut the material, foregrounding certain elements, and embark on the design process, looking for a logical environment in which all the action could realistically happen. You need to consider not just the place in which the play happens but the rest of the city.’

So immersed will her actors be in the world of the play by the end of rehearsals that they will be able to turn 360 degrees on stage, and their character will have a picture in their mind’s eye of what lies beyond – the geography, the history, even the time of day in their city... their beautiful, destroyed city.

DESIGNING ILIUM FOR THE 21st CENTURY
BUNNY CHRISTIE explains the look of Women of Troy
The set model-box for Women of Troy is looking slightly the worse for wear when designer Bunny Christie tracks it down to one of the hangar-like workshops at the National where scenery construction takes place. Some of the diminutive walls aren’t aligned properly – a few are even arranged back to front. Christie is happy, though: ‘I love seeing it like this,’ she says. ‘If it’s bashed about that means that the team are hard at work bringing it to life. They’re getting stuck in.’

Just by looking at the model-box, you can see that Christie has been thinking on a grand scale. The Lyttelton stage will be dominated by a huge split-level warehouse interior, every aspect of which has been intricately thought through.

‘When we started thinking about how a group of prisoners of war would be moved in a modern context, we considered various locations – like airports and bus terminals. Early on, though, Katie decided that, because of the play’s many references to the sea, it should be a port.’

Christie visited and photographed ports in her native Scotland, principally Dundee and Leith. ’It gave me a good sense of the scale. There were then precise logistical problems that we needed to solve – like where do we put Cassandra? And how do we keep Helen away from the other women? We also needed to ensure the space could conceivably handle the processing of hundreds of women.’

Christie is no stranger to the National. She recently designed Philistines for the Lyttelton and prior to that Galileo in the Olivier. A longstanding fan of Katie Mitchell’s work, this is the first time the pair have collaborated and Christie has eagerly embraced the director’s meticulous working methods. ‘You don’t just deal with what’s being seen but what’s happening all around. How do the women get there? By train, by coach? And when they leave where are they going to? I sketched aerial views the area. We needed to create a whole world.’

Christie describes the warehouse space as ‘cold, industrial, dark’. Particular
decisions have added to that austerity. ‘Early on, we had some windows that were quite low down. We decided to remove those because it would be more threatening if the women couldn’t see where they were being taken to. They believe they’re being put on ships but they might be taken to their death.’

When the set is combined with Paule Constable’s lighting, the bombardments of Gareth Fry’s soundscape and Vicki Mortimer’s contemporary costumes, the effect should be stunning. ‘The audience will absolutely feel that there’s this great port outside where the ships are leaving and that the war is coming closer and closer.’ Finally, she adds. ‘We’ve been researching the effects of explosives. At the end, the bombs start falling overhead. People had better brace themselves.’


GREEKS AND TROJANS, WINNERS AND LOSERS
MICHAEL GOULD (Talthybius)
In this version of the play, Talthybius and Sinon are the Greek civil servants who supervise the Trojan women. Talthybius tells them how they’re going to be allocated and later he has to take Andromache’s son and drop him from the battlements. Is he the hate-figure in the play? To say that would undermine its complexity. I think he struggles with what he has to do but he knows he has to get it done because his overriding desire is to get home. You could say that women suffer at the hands of men but I think it’s more interesting to show that it’s human beings who suffer at the hands of war. War is the hate figure.

HELENA LYMBERY (Rhea)
I’m one of a group of seven women who are the last of the evacuees to be rounded up and shipped out. We’ve inferred that they’re educated but within that shared class background, there are separate life stories. In rehearsal, we gather through provisation a set of mental pictures that we’re going to draw on in relation to particular moments of the play. These women witness specific acts of horror, carnage and massacre. By building up a detailed back-history, when these moments arise, they should really resonate. So, if you have a memory of treating a slave badly, the thought of becoming a slave yourself taps into that guilt and fear. It’s about making those moments very real, not just acting out generalised distress. And on a deep level, the play is looking at how any of us might behave in a chaotic violent situation.

KATE DUCHENE (Hecuba)
At the start of the play, the Trojan queen Hecuba has two daughters. One is taken away from her to become a slave, the second she learns has been butchered. Then her four-month old grandson – the last remaining royal – is taken away and thrown from the battlements. These are about the worst things that can happen to a human being and it feels like a gruelling part to undertake. Sometimes I think ‘Why are we putting ourselves through it?’ But actually in the world today there are women who have to suffer far worse things than we see on stage. Like most people I block out things I see on the news. The play feels like an attempt to cut through that blocking mechanism and confront what we’re too scared to look at.

Articles written by Dominic Cavendish, theatre critic for the Daily Telegraph and founder of www.theatrevoice.com

Friday, 23 November 2007

Unit 3 retake revision

Unit 3

unit 3 text in context

1 a) evaluate your contribution to the performance by tracing key moments during the journey from first reading of the play to final rehearsal.

b) Evaluate how specific rehearsal techniques were used within the group to help develop two characters.

2 Discuss the impact on your audience of one design element in your performance

b) Analyse the contributions made to the play in performance by two members of your group.

3 Evaluate the reaction of your audience to two specific moments from the play in performance

b Discuss your directors interpretation of the play and its impact upon your audience.

SECTION B

On one live production you have seen

4 a) Evaluate how effectively two performers used acting techniques in order to engage you during the performance.

b) Discuss the visual impact of the performance, giving two examples to show how this was achieved.

5. Evaluate the way the passage of time and/or a change of location were achieved during the performance.

b) Discuss the visual impact of the performance, giving two examples to show how this was achieved.

6 a) Evaluate how effectively theatrical devices used in the performance made the play relevant to you as a member of the audience.

b) Discuss to what extent the performance you have seen was presented as a product of our time.


See Debby for guidance if you are retaking this unit.